We'd love to meet you in person. Drop by our office in Pondicherry, or reach out online.
Address
No 48/1, Plot no 73, 1st Floor, Aziz Nagar, 2nd Cross Street, Reddiarpalayam, Oulgaret Municipality, Pondicherry – 605010
Phone
+91 88387 24261A Series B fintech was shipping bugs into production almost every release. Here's how a focused, phased testing overhaul changed that — and what we'd do differently next time.
When we started working with this Series B fintech, the engineering team already knew they had a problem — they just didn't yet have a plan for it. Nearly every release shipped at least one bug that customers noticed, sometimes in the payment flow itself, and the response had become reactive: fix it, apologize, ship a patch, repeat. The team wasn't careless. They were simply moving faster than their process could support, and testing had quietly become the thing that got cut whenever a deadline got tight.
The numbers, once we dug in, told a clear story. Roughly 45 to 50 bugs were reaching production every quarter, and a meaningful share of those were serious enough to require an urgent patch. Releases were taking two to three weeks partly because manual regression testing before each one consumed two to three full days on its own — and even after all that manual effort, core areas like payment processing had almost no automated coverage at all. Developers were spending more time firefighting bugs than building anything new.
None of this was surprising once we looked at the root cause: there was no automated test suite to speak of, no CI pipeline enforcing quality gates before code merged, and the pressure to ship fast had made "we'll test it manually if we have time" the default answer to every testing question.
We didn't start by writing tests. We started by figuring out which parts of the codebase, if they broke, would actually hurt the business — payment processing, authentication, and the core ledger logic that everything else depended on. That prioritization mattered more than raw coverage numbers early on; a team's first instinct is often to chase a coverage percentage, but 90% coverage of low-risk code is worth far less than 60% coverage concentrated on what would actually cause an incident.
From there, the work moved in stages. The first few weeks went into standing up the actual testing infrastructure — Jest for unit and integration tests, Cypress for the critical end-to-end user flows, wired into GitHub Actions so nothing could merge without passing. Only once that foundation existed did we start expanding coverage systematically: unit tests for the business logic first, since they're the cheapest to write and fastest to run, then integration tests around the API boundaries, then a focused set of end-to-end tests covering the handful of user journeys that actually mattered — sign-up, a transaction end to end, and the reconciliation flow.
The last stretch of the engagement was arguably the most important and the easiest to skip: making testing part of how the team actually worked, not a separate initiative bolted on beside it. That meant folding test coverage into the definition of done for a story, setting up code review checks that flagged untested logic, and writing down runbooks for the handful of failure modes that kept recurring, so the next engineer to hit one wouldn't have to relearn it from scratch.
Within the first quarter after the pipeline was fully in place, production bugs dropped by roughly 85%, and the handful of genuinely critical incidents — the kind that pages someone at 2am — nearly disappeared entirely. Code coverage went from around 15%, concentrated almost randomly wherever a developer happened to have written a test, to about 78%, deliberately weighted toward the highest-risk paths.
The release cycle itself changed shape more than we expected going in. What had been a two-to-three-week process compressed to three to five days, not because anyone rushed, but because the manual regression pass that used to eat two to three days shrank to roughly half an hour of automated checks that ran on every merge. That freed up real developer time — time that had been going almost entirely into bug fixes started going back into building product, and it showed in how the team talked about their own velocity.
There was a softer, harder-to-measure change too. Support tickets from customers about bugs dropped noticeably, and the team's own confidence in shipping — something you can feel in a standup even before it shows up in a metric — visibly improved. Nobody was holding their breath on release day anymore.
If we were starting this engagement again, we'd push harder, earlier, on eliminating flaky tests. A handful of unreliable end-to-end tests crept in during the expansion phase, and every flaky test that developers learn to ignore erodes trust in the whole suite a little — by the time we did a deliberate pass to fix or remove them, some engineers had already started reflexively re-running failed builds instead of investigating them. Catching that habit earlier would have saved a few weeks of quiet friction.
We'd also start the "testing is part of done" conversation with the team on day one instead of introducing it after the technical foundation was built. Tooling is the easy part of this kind of turnaround. The harder and more durable part is the team actually adopting testing as how they work, not as a project that happened to them — and that shift goes faster the earlier you start having it as an explicit conversation rather than assuming the tooling will make the case on its own.
None of this required exotic tooling — Jest, Cypress, and GitHub Actions are about as standard as testing stacks get. What made the difference was sequencing: get automated gates in place before chasing coverage numbers, prioritize the code that would actually hurt the business if it broke, and treat the cultural shift toward testing as work in its own right, not a side effect of better tools. A team doesn't need to test everything to stop shipping the bugs that matter most. They need to test the right things, consistently, and make it hard to skip.
CosmoOps Team
CosmoOps Team